2011年9月28日星期三

To Survive, Netflix 'Must Adapt'

When Netflix,The additions focus on key tag and magic cube combinations, Inc. announced news of a fee hike for users of both its online streaming and snail mail video rental, many customers decided to pull their ties with the movie giant, including Starz channel on cable and satellite providers. The reasoning was simple. Too much money was being spent by too many people on a service that was not utilized nearly enough to consider the service a deal.

This past Thursday, Netflix made the announcement of plans to integrate its video sharing capabilities with social media hub Facebook. The addition allows site users to watch videos on either website as well as view what friends are looking at. Sounds great, right? Well, maybe if you are in any of the other Netflix markets—but not here in the United States.

The hurdle in Netflix's track match is an old piece of legislation,we supply all kinds of polished tiles, the 1998 Video Privacy Protection Act law that puts the brakes on the disclosure of video sales or rental records. In other words, rental services cannot give out information about what movie someone watches, even if it is your best friend (or a complete stranger you've "friended" on the ever-changing Facebook site).

So, what does this mean for the very sharing culture we reside in today? Will laws change to mold the world we live in?

The change does not necessarily lie in Washington; it lies in Netflix. The company is doing what they should be doing—lobbying Congress. They have been doing that all year in order to pass some form of legislation that would revise the act established in1998 or create an entirely new act for this technology age.

As an important driver of Internet traffic, Netflix must adapt to the changing landscape that is the Internet movie service.

To be fair, it seems some of Netflix's decisions are justified. They are justified in the fact that such happenings are only inevitable if Netflix is in the business of surviving in the end. It is hard to pull a profit by clumping together both movies-by-mail and Internet Instant Streaming, only because it is a too-good-to-last concept.Replacement China Porcelain tile and bulbs for Canada and Worldwide. Making these services two separate things was a step in the right direction, even though consumers have the right to be mad about it. The future of video lies in the Internet.

Look at your favorite television shows. A few years ago, you could count on one hand which ones were available to watch for free on the web. Now, just about every show from every hour on every network is at the click of your mouse. Online is quick, reliable and just an overall convenient service.

Movie rental stores are for the most part feeling the punch.It's hard to beat the versatility of zentai suits on a production line. However, box rental locations—such as Redbox—who can benefit as their own services, are a close second to Netflix. The only downside is a tank of gas for some and 24-hour rental times (or a surcharge).

Netflix can't just sit back and relax, though. Some work must be done, and it should not come in the form of unexpected price increases (oh, too late). Streaming gives the more creative crowd more flexibility in sampling films before purchase. However, when it comes to the big moviegoers, the money is lost. Theatres will win. Perhaps grabbing a hold of those films quicker than competitors is an option. Maybe even premiere some movies of lesser demand on Netflix before they make it to the big screen.

Of course, there is also the problem of privacy and those free sites, such as Mega Video. However, the good thing is they often limit playback hours, only offering you a sample of a work. That competition might be lacking in the field of competitiveness.These girls have never had a oil painting supplies in their lives!

没有评论:

发表评论